← The Observatory
Observatory · Food hygiene

Number of food businesses with poor hygiene ratings in France: 14,700 in one year

14,700 food businesses received poor hygiene inspection ratings in one year, about 85% of them independents to approach one by one. Here is how many, in which types of business, of what size, in which départements (French county-level areas), and how quickly the list changes.

By Valentin Morterol Co-founder of Scalon
Inspections from October 2025 through September 202671,745 businesses inspected during the year4,450 still listed with poor ratings on November 9, 2026
The short answer

In one year, 14,700 food businesses received poor hygiene ratings in France, including 7,600 of its 186,300 restaurants. For suppliers, the key segment is about 12,600 independents outside chains, franchises and retailer groups (between 11,700 and 12,900). The official site still listed 4,450 on November 9, 2026 (Scalon Observatory).

Get the list of the 14,700 food businesses to bring into hygiene compliance, with the contact details available.

Get the full list

Published on October 14, 2026 · Updated on November 9, 2026 · Inspections published on Alim'Confiance (the French government's public food-safety inspection results), files from September 25, October 14 and November 9, 2026

Key figures
14,700
Food businesses with poor ratings in one year
Scalon estimate for inspections from October 2025 through September 2026 (13,600 to 15,800); 4,450 were still listed on November 9
About 85%
Poorly rated businesses that are independent of chains
About 85%, or 12,600 businesses, after checking 100 businesses drawn at random
1,400 per month
New businesses with poor ratings on the official list
1,186 added between October 14 and November 9, 2026 (26 days); almost as many leave: rebuild the list every week

In this article

How many poorly rated businesses, depending on your question?#

The answer depends on the question: 14,700 businesses received poor ratings in one year, but only 4,450 were still listed that way on November 9, 2026. Each figure in the table has its own denominator.

QuestionAnswerBasis
How many activity units in remise directe (direct sales to consumers)?321,500Direction générale de l'alimentation (DGAL, France's food directorate), Resytal system, 2023; 49% commercial foodservice
How many businesses inspected during the year, with a published rating?71,745Inspections carried out from September 26, 2025 to September 24, 2026
How many poorly rated in one year?14,700 (13,600 to 15,800)Of the 71,745 inspected: about 1 in 5
How many still listed with poor ratings on November 9?4,450Of the 65,051 businesses in that day's official file: 6.8 per 100
Of which "à corriger de manière urgente" (urgent correction needed)330Of the 4,450 listed

For market sizing, use 14,700: the number of businesses that needed to bring their operations into compliance at least once during the year. For a prospect list to call this week, use 4,450: those are the ratings still online. A business counts once, even if it has several activities rated separately, such as the departments of a supermarket.

Within the restaurant market, 7,600 restaurants received poor ratings in one year. France has 186,300 active restaurants: that is 4.1% of them. Of the 36,040 restaurants inspected during the year (19.3% of the country's restaurants), 21 per 100 received poor ratings. The two lists are built differently (the inspection file on one side, observed active restaurants on the other): of the 32,996 restaurants with a SIRET number (the French ID of a business location) in the official file of November 9, 2026, 19,847, or 6 in 10, can be matched directly to Scalon's count by that number. The 4.1% and 19.3% are therefore rough estimates. The full count is in the study on the number of restaurants in France, of which this study covers a submarket.

Why other sources give different numbers#

Other sources give different numbers because they count different things: ratings online, inspections, administrative measures or businesses to inspect. These figures are accurate; they do not measure the same thing.

SourceFigureWhat is counted
Alim'Confiance (the French government's public food-safety inspection results) dashboard, read on November 9, 20264,267 "à améliorer" (needs improvement) and 343 "à corriger de manière urgente", out of 71,457 inspectionsThe dashboard calls them "businesses"; they are ratings, one per activity inspected (they add up to the 71,457 inspections). Ratings online on a given date, over a rolling period. This is not an annual count
DGAL, rapport d'activité 202515,600 formal notices and 1,685 closures, or 17,285 measures, from 120,765 inspectionsCalendar year 2025, all inspections, published or not; measures, not businesses
Ministerial response of July 21, 2026Nearly 88,000 remise directe inspections in 2025, including nearly 70,000 by authorized contractorsInspections, not businesses, and remise directe only
Plan national de contrôles 2026-2030More than 270,000 commercial restaurants, more than 100,000 food retailers, nearly 110,000 institutional foodservice locationsBusinesses to inspect over five years
DGAL, Resytal, 2023321,500 activity unitsThe entire remise directe sector, 49% commercial foodservice

The official dashboard and our file from the same day are close: the November 9 file contains 4,628 poor ratings, corresponding to the 4,450 businesses. The dashboard reports 4,610 ratings: 18 fewer, with no update date shown.

The gap with the DGAL is larger: 17,285 measures against our 14,700 businesses. The DGAL counts measures during 2025, published or not. We count businesses with a published rating, over twelve months ending in September 2026. It is the same order of magnitude, not the same measure.

Scalon's 186,300 restaurants and the national plan's 270,000 commercial restaurants do not use the same definition. The plan counts commercial restaurants that inspection services must inspect. Scalon counts active restaurants open to the public, excluding bars. Neither figure corrects the other.

Hygiene inspection terms in plain English#

Inspection terms have precise meanings, and many readers confuse them. Here are the terms used in this article.

TermPlain definition
À améliorerHygiene level at which the authorities have formally ordered the operator to correct deficiencies within a deadline they set. The business stays open.
À corriger de manière urgenteHygiene level at which consumer health may be in danger. It almost always comes with a closure or a halt of activity.
Poorly ratedIn this article, at least one "à améliorer" or "à corriger de manière urgente" rating at an official inspection.
Follow-up visit (reinspection)A new inspection that checks the corrections. If it goes well, its rating replaces the poor one.
HACCPHazard analysis and critical control points method. Regulations require procedures based on its principles.
Plan de maîtrise sanitaire (food safety management plan)The business's documentation: good hygiene practices, HACCP procedures, traceability, management of noncompliance.
14-hour hygiene trainingRequired for at least one person in a commercial foodservice business (décret 2011-731, arrêté du 12 février 2024). Since February 1, 2026, only organizations authorized by the préfet de région (the national government's regional representative) may provide it.
Remise directeFood sales to the final consumer: restaurants, bakeries, butcher shops, supermarkets, caterers, cafeterias.
Approved businessA slaughterhouse or food-processing facility that sells to other professionals and holds food-safety approval. It is tracked separately from remise directe.

An "à améliorer" rating is therefore not a final penalty. It starts a correction period, and that deadline creates a need: training, drafting the plan de maîtrise sanitaire, treating the premises.

Which types of business receive poor ratings?#

Restaurants make up a little over half of the businesses poorly rated in one year (7,600 out of 14,700), but bakeries receive poor ratings most often: 30 per 100 inspected.

Type of businessPoorly rated in one yearSharePer 100 inspected during the year
Restaurants7,59551.6%21
Bakeries and pastry shops2,74818.7%30
Cafeterias and institutional kitchens1,2338.4%17
Butcher shops and charcuteries (prepared-meat shops)9736.6%25
Supermarkets, grocery stores and their departments8826.0%17
Approved slaughterhouses, food-processing facilities and warehouses7094.8%11
Caterers, fish shops, cheese shops, chocolatiers3682.5%14
Farm producers1971.3%15
Total14,705100%20

The table totals 14,705; everywhere else, we round it to 14,700.

Poorly rated for hygiene in one year, by type of businessFood businesses rated poorly at least once in official hygiene inspections, inspections from 9/26/2025 to 9/24/2026, Scalon estimate.Poorly rated for hygiene in one year, by type of business14,705 businesses, annual estimateRestaurantsRestaurants: 7,5957,595BakeriesBakeries: 2,7482,748Canteens and institutional kitchensCanteens and institutional kitchens: 1,2331,233Butchers and delisButchers and delis: 973973Supermarkets, grocers and departmentsSupermarkets, grocers and departments: 882882Slaughterhouses, plants and approved warehousesSlaughterhouses, plants and approved warehouses: 709709Caterers, fishmongers, cheese and chocolate shopsCaterers, fishmongers, cheese and chocolate shops: 368368Farm producersFarm producers: 197197
Caption: one in two poorly rated businesses is a restaurant. Food businesses rated poorly at least once in one year (14,705), by type of business, Scalon estimate. Scalon Observatory, November 2026.

Each type of business forms a submarket, with its own suppliers and needs.

  • Restaurants: about 7,600. 21 per 100 inspected during the year. The restaurant hygiene inspection guide is for operators.
  • Bakeries and pastry shops: about 2,750. 30 per 100 inspected during the year, the highest rate. See the bakery hygiene inspection guide.
  • Cafeterias and institutional kitchens: about 1,230. 17 per 100. The decision-maker is often a public body or nonprofit (see below).
  • Butcher shops and charcuteries: about 970. 25 per 100.
  • Supermarkets, grocery stores and departments: about 880. 17 per 100.
  • Approved slaughterhouses, food-processing facilities and warehouses: about 710. 11 per 100, the lowest rate.
  • Caterers, fish shops, cheese shops, chocolatiers: about 370. 14 per 100.
  • Farm producers: about 200. 15 per 100.

Independents, chains, franchises: who receives poor ratings?#

The segment that matters to compliance service providers is independent businesses outside chains, franchises, shared storefront names and retailer groups, which make their own purchasing decisions. About 12,600 of the businesses poorly rated in one year fall into this segment (between 11,700 and 12,900), or about 85%. Chains, franchises, retailer groups and corporate groups account for about 1,160, and public bodies and nonprofits for 980.

Our list of 190 networks initially classifies 13,150 businesses as independent (89.4%). To check this, we reviewed 100 businesses drawn at random (see the method): 4 of the 90 classified as independent actually belong to a chain or group missing from our list. The table accounts for this: about 584 businesses move to an "unidentified" row. The actual share of independents is about 85%, between 79.7% and 87.9%.

StructurePoorly rated in one yearShare
Independents outside chains, franchises and retailer groups12,56685.5%
Chains or groups not identified by our list (check of 100)5844.0%
Franchise chains3292.2%
Company-owned chains740.5%
Retailer groups and cooperatives1130.8%
Networks of unverified type310.2%
Institutional foodservice, healthcare and lodging groups280.2%
Nonprofits and foundations4302.9%
Public bodies (municipalities, schools, hospitals…)5503.7%
Total14,705100%
Who are the poorly rated businesses?Businesses rated poorly in one year by structure: independents outside any chain, networks (chains, franchises, buying groups, groups), public bodies and associations.Who are the poorly rated businesses?14,705 businesses, annual estimateIndependents, no chain: 12,566 (85%)85%Chains, franchises, buying groups, groups: 1,159 (8%)Public bodies and associations: 980 (7%)Independents, no chain: 12,566 (85%)Chains, franchises, buying groups, groups: 1,159 (8%)Public bodies and associations: 980 (7%)
Caption: about 85% of poorly rated businesses are independent of chains, after correction based on a check of 100 businesses. Scalon annual estimate, November 2026. Scalon Observatory, November 2026.

A secondary detail: among poorly rated independents, 20% are operated by a company with several locations (790 out of 3,955 in the November 9 file). This is a detail about the decision-maker, not the market definition.

Do chains receive poor ratings less often? Yes, for the same type of business. Check the denominator: this table covers the businesses in the official November 9, 2026 file and their ratings online that day, rather than the year. That is why the rates are lower than the "per 100 inspected during the year" figures in the other tables.

Type of businessIndependents: poorly rated online on November 9, per 100 in the fileChains or networks: poorly rated online on November 9, per 100 in the file
Restaurants7.31.8
Bakeries9.62.7
Supermarkets and grocery stores5.64.3

Among restaurants in the November 9 file, 2,249 independents out of 30,918 are listed with poor ratings, compared with 35 chain restaurants out of 1,986. For ratings online, the ratio is 4.1. For new poor ratings that appeared between October 14 and November 9, it is 3.2: 2.11 independent restaurants per 100 compared with 0.65 chain restaurants per 100. Independent restaurants therefore receive poor ratings 3 to 4 times as often as chain restaurants. Franchised restaurants are at 2.1 per 100.

Poorly rated online per 100: independents vs chainsShare of businesses shown as poorly rated on November 9, 2026 among those in the official file that day, by type and structure.Poorly rated online per 100: independents vs chainsRatings online on November 9, 2026Independent restaurantsIndependent restaurants: 7.3%7.3%Chain restaurantsChain restaurants: 1.8%1.8%Independent bakeriesIndependent bakeries: 9.6%9.6%Chain bakeriesChain bakeries: 2.7%2.7%Independent supermarkets and grocersIndependent supermarkets and grocers: 5.6%5.6%Network supermarkets and grocersNetwork supermarkets and grocers: 4.3%4.3%
Caption: for the same type of business, independents receive poor ratings more often than chains, especially restaurants and bakeries. Ratings online on November 9, 2026. Scalon Observatory, November 2026.

This comparison has a limitation that we measured. Chains leave the list faster: between October 14 and November 9, 33 per 100 poorly rated chain businesses left it, compared with 20 per 100 independents. The gap in ratings online is therefore somewhat inflated; that is why we also give the ratio for new poor ratings. The share shows where potential customers are, not who is cleaner.

Cafeterias have their own decision-makers. In the November 9 file, 6,765 cafeterias and institutional kitchens have been inspected and 394 are poorly rated. Half of the cafeterias inspected are public (3,385): 169 are poorly rated, or 5.0 per 100. Nonprofits account for 1,718, including 115 poorly rated (6.7 per 100). Cafeterias run by a private company outside the networks on our list account for 1,393, including 100 poorly rated (7.2 per 100): 26 of the 99 whose company is known belong to a company with 10 or more active locations (company cafeterias, kitchens of large groups), making the term "independent" unreliable for cafeterias, as it is for approved food-processing facilities. Institutional foodservice groups run 236, including 9 poorly rated (3.8 per 100). The remaining 33 inspected cafeterias, including 1 with a poor rating, belong to branded chains.

Which networks, and who makes purchasing decisions?#

In the November 9 file, 167 networks have at least one inspected business, and 54 of them have at least one poorly rated business. The network type tells you who makes purchasing decisions.

Network typeNetworksBusinesses inspectedNetworks with at least one poorly rated businessWho decides
Franchise1002,98730The franchisee, within the rules set by headquarters
Retailer group or cooperative78426Each member, an independent retailer
Company-owned locations207077Headquarters or regional management
Unverified type263614Check network by network
Corporate group (institutional foodservice, healthcare, lodging)142627The group's regional management

The ten largest network operators, ranked by businesses inspected, are listed below. We do not publish the rate of poor ratings for individual chains.

NetworkTypeBusinesses inspected
CarrefourFranchise656
IntermarchéRetailer group352
McDonald'sFranchise293
Coopérative URetailer group224
Marie BlachèreFranchise163
Burger KingFranchise153
E.LeclercRetailer group152
FranprixFranchise152
LidlCompany-owned locations142
AldiCompany-owned locations115

Overall, chain businesses (franchises, company-owned locations, retailer groups, unverified type) make up 7.5% of businesses inspected and 3.3% of poorly rated businesses: 147 out of 4,897, or 3.0 per 100.

For a supplier, this changes the sales process. A company-owned chain's headquarters can sign for its entire network. Selling to a retailer group or franchise generally means selling location by location, unless an agreement is reached with the network operator: check network by network. For public cafeterias, the contact is the municipality or public body.

How large are the accounts? Company revenue and profiles#

Half of poorly rated companies that publish their financial statements generate less than €961,000 in annual revenue. This is a narrow base: 500 companies out of 4,080.

We linked the poorly rated businesses of November 9 to their companies (counting each company once) and read financial statements published since 2023. Only 12.3% of poorly rated companies have published revenue since 2023. Published financial statements mainly cover larger organizations: revenue is published for 24.6% of locations with employees, compared with 7.8% of the others.

Company revenuePoorly rated (500 companies)Inspected (8,527 companies)
Less than €250,00022.8%17.9%
€250,000 to €1M28.6%25.1%
€1M to €10M28.8%35.3%
€10M and above19.8%21.6%

Half of inspected companies that publish their financial statements generate less than €1,451,000. Among poorly rated independents (445 companies), half generate less than €746,000. Note that this group also contains 6 large companies with more than one billion euros in revenue (€43 billion among the six), whose company cafeterias are classified as outside networks; without them, half of the remaining 439 generate less than €731,000, but their combined revenue is not meaningful for an independent business. Among poorly rated restaurants (208 companies), half generate less than €423,000, compared with €696,000 for inspected restaurants (4,177 companies).

Combined revenue is not useful for sizing an account: poorly rated companies that publish their financial statements total €107 billion, but the largest 10% account for 98.3% of it. These are large groups, often owning many locations. For training or audit services, the useful account size is the revenue threshold below which half of companies fall: less than €423,000 for restaurants, less than €961,000 across all business types.

Company profiles add to the picture of account size. Poorly rated businesses are slightly newer and slightly more often run as sole proprietorships (private businesses, excluding public bodies and nonprofits).

Specifically: 18.0% of poorly rated businesses are less than 2 years old, compared with 15.7% of those inspected; 13.7% are run as sole proprietorships, compared with 12.1%.

The full profile (Sirene business register)
Profile (Sirene register)Poorly rated (4,111 businesses)Inspected (59,362 businesses)
Business location created less than 2 years ago18.0%15.7%
Created 2 to 5 years ago29.0%29.7%
Created 6 to 15 years ago32.3%32.1%
Created more than 15 years ago20.7%22.5%
Run as a sole proprietorship13.7%12.1%
Location with employees54.9%58.7%
Company with several active locations20.8%24.4%

The gap is wider for restaurants: 23.2% of poorly rated restaurants are less than 2 years old, compared with 20.0% of inspected restaurants.

Two economic signals add to this. Among poorly rated companies matched in our business-event database (1,877), 2.5% have undergone insolvency proceedings, compared with 1.5% of inspected companies (25,939). And 11.0% have had a business asset acquisition since 2024, compared with 12.9% of those inspected. Insolvency proceedings do not explain why the rating is poor. They indicate a financially vulnerable customer: approach with a clear offer and a firm price.

Selling to food businesses to bring into hygiene compliance? Get the list for your area and your target, ready to call.

Get the full list

Why did the inspection take place?#

Inspections triggered by a signal (complaint, foodborne illness, targeted inspection) result in nearly 1 poor rating in 5, compared with 7 per 100 for routine inspections. One in 5 inspections prompted by a complaint results in a poor rating. Ratings online on November 9, 2026 mostly come from routine inspections.

Reason for inspection (ratings online on November 9, 2026)RatingsPoor ratingsPer 100 ratings
Routine inspection53,2723,8087.1
Follow-up visit (reinspection)14,1862181.5
Targeted inspection1,54429218.9
Complaint or report1,01920520.1
Toxi-infection alimentaire collective (TIAC, foodborne illness outbreak)5219618.4
Approval application92391.0
Total71,4654,6286.5

Inspections triggered by a complaint, foodborne illness or a targeted inspection together result in 19.2 poor ratings per 100 (593 out of 3,084), compared with 7.1 for routine inspections. They account for 12.8% of poor ratings.

For a service provider, this is a useful filter. A business rated poorly after a complaint or foodborne illness has an urgent need and strong motivation. A business rated poorly at a routine inspection also has a deadline to meet, but the need is less pressing.

Where are poorly rated businesses located?#

The départements (French county-level areas) of Paris, Nord and Seine-Saint-Denis have the most poorly rated businesses in one year: about 930, 690 and 550. These numbers cover all food businesses, not only restaurants.

DépartementPoorly rated in one year (estimate)Per 100 inspected during the yearListed with poor ratings on November 9
Paris93018233
Nord69034169
Seine-Saint-Denis55029127
Bouches-du-Rhône54023191
Rhône5302497
Alpes-Maritimes45022107

The last column gives the number of businesses listed with poor ratings on the official site on November 9, 2026. The full table, with your département, is just below.

Your département: the full table
DépartementPoorly rated in one year (estimate)Listed with poor ratings on November 9
Ain (01)12043
Aisne (02)10032
Allier (03)7824
Alpes-de-Haute-Provence (04)3017
Hautes-Alpes (05)5011
Alpes-Maritimes (06)450107
Ardèche (07)8032
Ardennes (08)3110
Ariège (09)328
Aube (10)3414
Aude (11)8128
Aveyron (12)5928
Bouches-du-Rhône (13)540191
Calvados (14)18063
Cantal (15)6832
Charente (16)7920
Charente-Maritime (17)9011
Cher (18)5831
Corrèze (19)5725
Côte-d'Or (21)11027
Côtes-d'Armor (22)7825
Creuse (23)2911
Dordogne (24)7023
Doubs (25)10054
Drôme (26)10028
Eure (27)8231
Eure-et-Loir (28)8814
Finistère (29)9228
Gard (30)21050
Haute-Garonne (31)25055
Gers (32)5117
Gironde (33)30077
Hérault (34)28088
Ille-et-Vilaine (35)13034
Indre (36)5314
Indre-et-Loire (37)7216
Isère (38)20067
Jura (39)4626
Landes (40)8223
Loir-et-Cher (41)3110
Loire (42)15048
Haute-Loire (43)7438
Loire-Atlantique (44)13035
Loiret (45)18063
Lot (46)3920
Lot-et-Garonne (47)9335
Lozère (48)3214
Maine-et-Loire (49)6915
Manche (50)8131
Marne (51)365
Haute-Marne (52)327
Mayenne (53)5819
Meurthe-et-Moselle (54)5320
Meuse (55)3415
Morbihan (56)20064
Moselle (57)11047
Nièvre (58)3819
Nord (59)690169
Oise (60)14040
Orne (61)9268
Pas-de-Calais (62)20067
Puy-de-Dôme (63)20058
Pyrénées-Atlantiques (64)12032
Hautes-Pyrénées (65)11039
Pyrénées-Orientales (66)14043
Bas-Rhin (67)22079
Haut-Rhin (68)13036
Rhône (69)53097
Haute-Saône (70)2416
Saône-et-Loire (71)10052
Sarthe (72)10035
Savoie (73)19064
Haute-Savoie (74)27065
Paris (75)930233
Seine-Maritime (76)27095
Seine-et-Marne (77)27051
Yvelines (78)28081
Deux-Sèvres (79)739
Somme (80)9921
Tarn (81)7616
Tarn-et-Garonne (82)5225
Var (83)350103
Vaucluse (84)10032
Vendée (85)12042
Vienne (86)473
Haute-Vienne (87)3812
Vosges (88)7943
Yonne (89)5618
Territoire de Belfort (90)3614
Essonne (91)31072
Hauts-de-Seine (92)42078
Seine-Saint-Denis (93)550127
Val-de-Marne (94)45079
Val-d'Oise (95)29071
Corse-du-Sud (2A)7632
Haute-Corse (2B)7238
Guadeloupe (971)12060
Martinique (972)209
Guyane (973)3215
La Réunion (974)5625
Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon (975)00
Mayotte (976)8241
Saint-Barthélemy (977)00
Saint-Martin (978)11
Département not specified in the file—104
Total14,7044,450

The rows are rounded; the total is the exact sum across départements.

Taking the type of business into account, 10 départements have more poorly rated businesses during the year than the benchmark, and 14 have fewer, out of the 92 we were able to compare. The benchmark is the number of businesses that would be poorly rated if each type of business in the département had the same rate as nationwide. It is not a permissible quota of poor ratings. A département above the benchmark does not necessarily have less clean businesses: inspections may be organized differently there.

Here is an example above the benchmark. Of the 266 businesses inspected in Guadeloupe, about 120 were poorly rated during the year, or 45 per 100, when the benchmark is 20. And an example below: of the 1,276 businesses inspected in Loire-Atlantique, about 130, or 11 per 100, when the benchmark is 21.

Your département: the full comparison
DépartementBusinesses inspectedPoorly rated in one year, per 100Benchmark per 100Reading
Ain6531920no gap established with the benchmark
Aisne3912621no gap established with the benchmark
Allier3452220no gap established with the benchmark
Alpes-de-Haute-Provence2701120no gap established with the benchmark
Hautes-Alpes3941319below the benchmark
Alpes-Maritimes2,0202222no gap established with the benchmark
Ardèche6771221no gap established with the benchmark
Ardennes2061522no gap established with the benchmark
Ariège2821120no gap established with the benchmark
Aube3051121no gap established with the benchmark
Aude5971420no gap established with the benchmark
Aveyron3151919no gap established with the benchmark
Bouches-du-Rhône2,3322321no gap established with the benchmark
Calvados6172921above the benchmark
Cantal2342918above the benchmark
Charente3362420no gap established with the benchmark
Charente-Maritime8171120below the benchmark
Cher3041921no gap established with the benchmark
Corrèze2951920no gap established with the benchmark
Côte-d'Or4422621no gap established with the benchmark
Côtes-d'Armor6321218no gap established with the benchmark
Creuse2211320no gap established with the benchmark
Dordogne6261120below the benchmark
Doubs4162421no gap established with the benchmark
Drôme7431321no gap established with the benchmark
Eure3682222no gap established with the benchmark
Eure-et-Loir3982221no gap established with the benchmark
Finistère7691220below the benchmark
Gard1,0252021no gap established with the benchmark
Haute-Garonne1,5301621below the benchmark
Gers2701919no gap established with the benchmark
Gironde1,4962021no gap established with the benchmark
Hérault1,8621521below the benchmark
Ille-et-Vilaine8671520no gap established with the benchmark
Indre2112519no gap established with the benchmark
Indre-et-Loire3841920no gap established with the benchmark
Isère1,3011621no gap established with the benchmark
Jura3021519no gap established with the benchmark
Landes6191320below the benchmark
Loir-et-Cher1771820under 200 businesses: not compared
Loire8281821no gap established with the benchmark
Haute-Loire4491620no gap established with the benchmark
Loire-Atlantique1,2761121below the benchmark
Loiret5883122no gap established with the benchmark
Lot1802221under 200 businesses: not compared
Lot-et-Garonne4442119no gap established with the benchmark
Lozère1661920under 200 businesses: not compared
Maine-et-Loire5861220below the benchmark
Manche5671419no gap established with the benchmark
Marne571621below the benchmark
Haute-Marne2391320no gap established with the benchmark
Mayenne2502319no gap established with the benchmark
Meurthe-et-Moselle4491220no gap established with the benchmark
Meuse1801920under 200 businesses: not compared
Morbihan9952019no gap established with the benchmark
Moselle1,0311121no gap established with the benchmark
Nièvre1572420under 200 businesses: not compared
Nord2,0453421above the benchmark
Oise5502522no gap established with the benchmark
Orne3113019above the benchmark
Pas-de-Calais8932220no gap established with the benchmark
Puy-de-Dôme7812620above the benchmark
Pyrénées-Atlantiques7631621no gap established with the benchmark
Hautes-Pyrénées3693119no gap established with the benchmark
Pyrénées-Orientales8841621below the benchmark
Bas-Rhin9822322no gap established with the benchmark
Haut-Rhin5792220no gap established with the benchmark
Rhône2,2182421no gap established with the benchmark
Haute-Saône1261920under 200 businesses: not compared
Saône-et-Loire6331620no gap established with the benchmark
Sarthe5322020no gap established with the benchmark
Savoie7322622no gap established with the benchmark
Haute-Savoie1,1122420no gap established with the benchmark
Paris5,1851820no gap established with the benchmark
Seine-Maritime1,0252620above the benchmark
Seine-et-Marne9552921no gap established with the benchmark
Yvelines8823221above the benchmark
Deux-Sèvres3502119no gap established with the benchmark
Somme3942521no gap established with the benchmark
Tarn4861621below the benchmark
Tarn-et-Garonne3361520no gap established with the benchmark
Var2,1321621below the benchmark
Vaucluse6651621no gap established with the benchmark
Vendée7221619no gap established with the benchmark
Vienne3191520below the benchmark
Haute-Vienne2611522no gap established with the benchmark
Vosges4341820no gap established with the benchmark
Yonne2532220no gap established with the benchmark
Territoire de Belfort1173121under 200 businesses: not compared
Essonne9903121no gap established with the benchmark
Hauts-de-Seine1,3093221no gap established with the benchmark
Seine-Saint-Denis1,8852921no gap established with the benchmark
Val-de-Marne1,6262820no gap established with the benchmark
Val-d'Oise9773021above the benchmark
Corse-du-Sud4081920no gap established with the benchmark
Haute-Corse5131419no gap established with the benchmark
Guadeloupe2664520above the benchmark
Martinique254818no gap established with the benchmark
Guyane883619under 200 businesses: not compared
La Réunion2192617above the benchmark
Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon5016under 200 businesses: not compared
Mayotte1366022under 200 businesses: not compared
Saint-Barthélemy2014under 200 businesses: not compared
Saint-Martin9819under 200 businesses: not compared
The full lists of départements above and below the benchmark

Above the benchmark (10): Guadeloupe, Cantal, Nord, Orne, Yvelines, La Réunion, Val-d'Oise, Calvados, Seine-Maritime, Puy-de-Dôme.

Below the benchmark (14): Marne, Loire-Atlantique, Charente-Maritime, Dordogne, Maine-et-Loire, Finistère, Hautes-Alpes, Landes, Vienne, Hérault, Pyrénées-Orientales, Tarn, Var, Haute-Garonne.

For the other 68 départements compared, our study cannot conclude that there are more or fewer poorly rated businesses than the benchmark.

Regions provide another scale. This view uses ratings online on November 9, 2026, per 100 businesses in the file (rather than the annual count used for départements). Among the regions of metropolitan France (European France, including Corsica), the share of poorly rated businesses ranges from 4.8 per 100 in Nouvelle-Aquitaine to 11.1 in Normandie. In overseas territories, the share reaches 26.7 in Guadeloupe and 39.8 in Mayotte, based on small numbers of businesses.

Regions: businesses in the November 9 file and poor ratings online
RegionBusinesses in the filePoorly rated onlinePer 100
Île-de-France12,3257926.4
Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes9,0475966.6
Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur6,9584616.6
Occitanie7,1824316.0
Hauts-de-France3,8133298.6
Normandie2,58328811.1
Nouvelle-Aquitaine5,8292814.8
Grand Est4,3572766.3
Bourgogne-Franche-Comté2,17022610.4
Bretagne2,8991515.2
Centre-Val de Loire1,8071488.2
Pays de la Loire2,9251465.0
Corse758709.2
Guadeloupe2256026.7
Mayotte1034139.8
La Réunion1822513.7
Guyane901516.7
Martinique22794.0
Saint-Martin1218.3
Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon300.0
Saint-Barthélemy200.0
Unspecified region1,5541046.7
Total65,0514,4506.8

Regions are ranked by number of poorly rated businesses, with the unspecified region last. The count shows where potential customers are; the share shows where inspections most often found a problem.

The market changes every month#

The number of businesses listed with poor ratings stays roughly stable, but the list changes constantly: 4,335 on September 25, 4,305 on October 14, 4,450 on November 9, 2026.

Between October 14 and November 9 (26 days), 1,186 businesses joined the list and 1,041 left it. Of those that left, 824 were reinspected without a poor rating and 217 were removed from the site. Another 3,264 remained, or 76 per 100.

That amounts to about 1,400 businesses newly listed with poor ratings per month (1,368 scaled to 30 days). This is consistent with the annual count: 14,700 over twelve months, or an average of 1,226 per month.

For prospecting, the implication is simple: work from a list of poorly rated businesses each week. A three-month-old file has lost entries, including businesses that have already corrected their deficiencies, and misses recent additions.

Three-week follow-up: what happens to poor ratings?

Between September 25 and October 14, 2026, we tracked the 4,485 poor ratings online on September 25 (4,335 businesses). 16 per 100 were replaced by a good rating.

Poor ratings, from September 25 to October 14, 2026Number
Poor ratings online on September 254,485
… still there on October 14, with no new inspection3,572
… replaced by a good rating after a new inspection698
… reinspected at a follow-up visit and still rated poorly14
… removed from the site: inspection more than a year old106
… removed from the site with no reason given95
New poor ratings that appeared between the two dates888
Poor ratings online on October 144,474

The count adds up: 4,485 ratings, minus the 899 ratings replaced or removed, plus the 888 new ones, make 4,474. For the ratings that were replaced, the new inspection generally took place 3 months after the poor rating. A rating removed from the site is not a correction: it drops out after a year, or with no reason given. Among ratings from August and September inspections, those that arrived late are more often poor (23 per 100) than those already online on September 25 (12 per 100).

How do you find and understand a business's hygiene rating?#

Six steps are enough to find a business on Alim'Confiance.

Finding and reading a rating

1. Search for the business. On alimconfiance.agriculture.gouv.fr, type its name or its city.

2. Check the address. Several businesses can have the same name: read only the listing at the right address.

3. Read the date and the level together. A rating stays online for 1 year from the date of the inspection. A business with a recent poor rating is often still awaiting a follow-up inspection.

4. Understand the two poor ratings. "À améliorer": the authorities require the manager to fix the problems within a deadline they set (this is a formal notice). This is the case for the 4,152 ratings of this level shown on September 25. "À corriger de manière urgente": consumer health may be in danger, and 322 of the 333 ratings of this level led to a closure or a halt of activity.

5. A missing listing proves nothing. Three cases are possible. The business was not inspected during the year. Or the inspection is recent but not yet online: the operator has 15 days to submit comments before the rating goes online. Or the rating was removed, after a year or with no reason given. A missing listing says neither that there was no inspection, nor that everything is fine, nor that the business is closed.

6. A recent good rating can follow a poor one. A well-rated follow-up visit erases the earlier poor rating: the listing does not show the history.

The other food businesses have no rating online; among restaurants, more than 4 in 5 have none: 33,102 restaurants have a rating online on November 9, 2026, out of 186,300 active restaurants (a rough estimate, since the two lists are built differently). Did you see a problem on site? The restaurant hygiene inspection guide explains how to report it.

Poorly rated: what should the business do?#

A business rated "à améliorer" must correct its deficiencies within the deadline set by the authorities, then undergo a new inspection.

What to do after a poor rating

1. Submit your comments. Before the rating goes online, the operator has 15 days to submit comments.

2. Note the deadline in the formal notice. It requires corrective measures within a deadline set by the authorities.

3. Make corrections with your plan de maîtrise sanitaire in hand. Regulations require procedures based on HACCP principles (hazard analysis and critical control points), within a plan de maîtrise sanitaire. In commercial foodservice, at least one person must have completed hygiene training: a minimum of 14 hours, unless a manager can demonstrate at least 3 years of experience as a manager or operator in the food sector.

4. Prepare for the follow-up visit. A new inspection checks that the corrective measures are in place; if it goes well, the new rating replaces the poor one.

5. Urgent case: expect to close. In an emergency, the authorities can order an immediate closure, or a halt of activities, until measures that allow reopening are in place (Code rural, article L233-1).

Each step leads to a purchase. Here is what the business needs and who supplies it.

Business's stageNeedWho can sell it
Formal notice, deadline setAssessment of the premises and action planHygiene consultants, audit firms
Plan de maîtrise sanitaireHACCP procedures, temperature logs, traceabilityConsultants, traceability software vendors
14-hour trainingCourse with an organization authorized by the préfet de régionTraining organizations
Pests, deteriorating premisesRodent control, cleaning, disinfection, repairsPest control and cleaning companies
Food storageRefrigeration equipment, probes, laboratory testingRefrigeration contractors, laboratories

And if nothing is corrected?#

If the corrections requested in the formal notice are not made, the fine can reach €1,500, or €3,000 for a repeat offense (a 5th-class contravention, Code rural, article R. 205-6). Failing to comply with a closure decision is punishable by 2 years in prison and a €30,000 fine (Code rural, article L. 237-2).

To challenge a decision, a recours gracieux (informal appeal) is a complaint sent to the authority that made it, within 2 months (3 months in overseas territories). The guide on what to do after an "à améliorer" rating gives the details. Our file does not publish the reasons for the ratings. For example, the préfecture de Seine-et-Marne (the local office of France's national government) cites pests, rodents and a loss of food traceability as reasons for closures. It also cites food kept past its use-by date, deteriorating premises and poor storage conditions.

How can you use these figures for market research?#

These figures serve four purposes: sizing the market, segmenting it, choosing a territory and tracking a changing market.

Size an addressable market#

An offering for all food businesses starts with 14,700 poorly rated businesses in one year. It breaks down as follows: about 12,600 independents to approach one by one; about 1,160 locations in chains, franchises, retailer groups and corporate groups, which can also be approached through their network operators; 980 public bodies and nonprofits, where the buyer is the municipality, public body or nonprofit.

Segment the market#

Break down business types by structure. The 7,600 poorly rated restaurants require a different sales approach from the 2,750 bakeries: among those in the November 9 file, independent restaurants are poorly rated at 7.3 per 100, independent bakeries at 9.6.

Choose a territory#

Counts (Paris 930, Nord 690) show the scale. To compare two départements, relate them to businesses inspected: 34 per 100 inspected during the year in Nord, 18 in Paris.

Track a changing market#

About 1,400 businesses join the list each month, and almost as many leave. A study needs a date and regular updates: the Observatory publishes its counts with their dates and methods.

Need the list of food businesses to bring into hygiene compliance? We send it with the contact details available, for the scope you choose.

Get the full list

How do you build a prospect list of poorly rated businesses?#

A good list starts with the official source, matches it to public listings and is updated every week. Five points determine its quality.

  1. Start with the official file. The public Alim'Confiance file provides an address for 99.2% of businesses and a valid SIRET number for 99.7%. It is the most reliable starting point for identifying a business.
  2. Match phone numbers and websites. The official file provides the address; phone numbers and websites come from other public listings and business directories. Among the 1,329 poorly rated restaurants matched to our public business listings, 44.3% have a website, compared with 47.4% of inspected restaurants. Limitation: we have not measured phone or email coverage, or websites for other business types; matching still needs to be done business by business.
  3. Filter by structure. Independent, network operator or public body: the contact and sales pitch differ (see the networks).
  4. Keep up with the pace. About 1,400 businesses join the list each month, almost as many leave: rebuild the list every week; a three-month-old file has lost a large share of its entries.
  5. Comply with the GDPR. Use business contact addresses for outreach, explain where the contact information comes from and respect the right to object. A sole proprietor is still an individual: their listing requires extra care.

Scalon's market size calculator helps define this scope before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions#

How many food businesses have poor hygiene ratings in France?#

14,700 in one year, according to Scalon's estimate for inspections carried out from September 26, 2025 to September 24, 2026, or about 1 inspected business in 5. The official site showed only 4,450 on November 9, 2026.

How many restaurants receive poor ratings?#

About 7,600 in one year, out of 186,300 active restaurants in France (4.1%, a rough estimate: the two lists are built differently). Of 100 restaurants inspected during the year, 21 received poor ratings.

What share of poorly rated businesses are independent?#

About 85%, or about 12,600 businesses out of 14,700. Chains, franchises, retailer groups and corporate groups account for about 1,160, public bodies and nonprofits for 980.

How many closures?#

Only "à corriger de manière urgente" ratings come with a closure or a halt of activity: 322 times out of 333 among ratings online on September 25, 2026. The DGAL counts 1,685 closures in 2025, across all inspections.

How long does a rating stay online?#

A year from the inspection date. A follow-up visit replaces the previous rating.

Does a poor rating mean closure?#

No, not in general. An "à améliorer" rating is a formal notice: the business stays open and makes corrections.

Does the business have to display its rating?#

No. According to Service-public.fr, businesses do not have to display their hygiene rating on their storefronts. Businesses only have the option to display it.

Is hygiene training mandatory?#

Yes, in commercial foodservice: at least one person must have completed 14 hours of training, unless a manager can demonstrate 3 years of experience as a manager or operator in the food sector. Since February 1, 2026, only organizations authorized by the préfet de région may provide it.

Do you sell to food businesses?#

Do you sell to food businesses?

Hygiene consultants, training organizations, pest control or cleaning companies, traceability software vendors: Scalon links each poorly rated business to its company and public contact information, and identifies those that belong to a network. A poor rating does not say what the business was cited for: check the current rating and its date before any outreach.

Professionals: get a list of 100 businesses in my area

Method#

The ratings come from the official Alim'Confiance file, published by the DGAL, extracted on September 25, October 14 and November 9, 2026. The annual count reconstructs inspections from September 26, 2025 to September 24, 2026. The structural classification matches each business to the Sirene register and a dictionary of networks documented by public pages. To check this classification, Scalon randomly drew 100 of the 4,450 businesses listed with poor ratings on November 9, 2026 and reviewed them twice, independently. The two reviews agree on business type for 100 businesses out of 100 and on structure for 97 out of 100; the 3 disagreements were resolved. Our classification gets the business type wrong for 1 business out of 100 (at most 5 out of 100) and the structure for 5 out of 100 (at most 11 out of 100): 4 of the 90 classified as independent belong to a group or chain missing from our list, hence the corrected share of about 85%.

Method details and limitations
  • Counting unit: a business is a 14-digit SIRET number; units without a valid SIRET number each count as one business. It is "poorly rated" if at least one of its units was rated "à améliorer" or "à corriger de manière urgente".
  • Files read: official files from September 25, 2026 (72,102 ratings, 65,101 businesses, 4,335 poorly rated), October 14 (71,373 ratings, 4,305 poorly rated businesses) and November 9 (71,465 ratings, 65,051 businesses, 4,450 poorly rated including 330 "à corriger de manière urgente"; inspections from November 10, 2025 to November 6, 2026).
  • Annual reconstruction: the file keeps only the latest rating for each activity. We add the 4,485 poor ratings displayed on September 25, the 888 posted late, about 8,642 poor ratings erased by 13,425 well-rated follow-up visits (each visit is weighted by the probability that it replaced a poor rating) and about 1,127 poor ratings removed from the site with no reason given. Total: about 15,142 ratings, or 14,706 businesses, rounded to 14,700. Depending on the assumption for visits whose previous rating is unknown: 13,569 to 15,839 businesses. Of 400 calculations rerun with different assumptions, 95 out of 100 give between 13,397 and 15,973. Not counted: poor ratings erased by a second visit and late-September ratings not yet online; these pull the total down. Businesses inspected in one year (71,745) are derived using the same calculation.
  • No new annual estimate: the September 25 export, the basis of the reconstruction, is no longer retained. The annual total is the one from October 14. The three snapshots of the file (September 25, October 14, November 9) show that the pace has not changed.
  • Central purchasing organizations and labels: the official file does not say whether a business without a shared storefront name belongs to a central purchasing organization or carries a miller's label (these labels appear only 21 times among 71,465 ratings). These members therefore remain counted as independents; retailer groups with a shared storefront name have their own row. A booking platform is never counted as a network.
  • Structure: networks = storefront names from a dictionary of 190 networks whose type is documented by public pages (franchise: franchisee recruitment page; company-owned locations: at least 90% of matched locations under the same company; retailer group: public source; corporate group: owner cited). Public bodies and nonprofits = legal category in the register. Independent = the rest. The annual estimate by structure distributes each business type's annual total according to the structure of that type's poorly rated businesses listed on November 9.
  • Check of 100 businesses: random draw (seed 20261109) from the 4,450 listed with poor ratings, two independent reviews of business type and structure, three disagreements resolved. Business-type error 1% (upper bound 5.4%), structure error 5% (upper bound 11.2%). Of the 90 classified as independent, 4 belong to a group or chain: corrected share 85.5% (between 79.7% and 87.9%), or 12,566 businesses.
  • Revenue and profile: Sirene register as of September 24, 2026 for age, legal form, headcount; financial statements published since 2023, positive revenue, each company counted once. Financial statements found for 500 of the 4,080 poorly rated companies (12.3%) and 8,527 of the 56,098 inspected companies (15.2%). Insolvency proceedings and business asset acquisitions: business-event database covering 1,877 poorly rated companies and 25,939 inspected companies.
  • Limitations of the structural classification: the annual estimate by structure distributes each business type's total according to the structure of businesses with poor ratings online on November 9. Since chains leave the list faster (33 per 100 in 26 days, compared with 20 per 100 for independents), it slightly overestimates the share of independents; the difference stays within the published range (11,700 to 12,900). The ratio between independent and chain restaurants is 4.1 for ratings online (95 times out of 100, between 3.0 and 5.7) and 3.2 for new poor ratings from October 14 to November 9 (between 1.9 and 5.6).
  • Revenue, precision: the middle value is €961,000 for poorly rated companies (95 times out of 100, between €768,000 and €1,135,000), €423,000 for poorly rated restaurants (between €327,000 and €559,000) and €696,000 for inspected restaurants (between €647,000 and €748,000), based on 2,000 repeated draws of companies.
  • Départements: annual estimate using the same reconstruction; 92 départements have at least 200 businesses inspected and are compared. A gap is retained only if it also appears in displayed ratings, for the same inspection month and type of business, in both data pulls.
  • Limitations: ratings online on November 9 depend on the pace of follow-up visits; a rating removed from the site is not a correction; chains missing from our dictionary remain classified as independent; published financial statements overrepresent large companies. Shares are rounded to one decimal place; they do not always add up to exactly 100%. Numbers of 100 and above are rounded to the nearest ten in département tables.
  • Cost: public files, one read of the local register and two read queries on the graph; no paid calls.

Key takeaways#

  • 14,700 food businesses received poor hygiene ratings in one year, including 7,600 restaurants; 4,450 were still listed that way on November 9, 2026.
  • About 85% are independents outside chains, franchises and retailer groups: about 12,600 owners to approach one by one.
  • For the same type of business, independent restaurants receive poor ratings 3 to 4 times as often as chain restaurants (7.3 versus 1.8 per 100 restaurants in the November 9 file; 2.11 versus 0.65 for new poor ratings).
  • Half of poorly rated companies that publish their financial statements generate less than €961,000: the appropriate sales prospect is a small organization.
  • About 1,400 businesses join the list each month, almost as many leave: rebuild the list every week; a three-month-old file has lost a large share of its entries.
The full study · PDF

The study runs to 51 pages, we will send it

Everything is on this page, and you can cite it without asking. The PDF holds the whole study, tables, figures, method and sources, in one document to keep, print or pass on. It goes out by email, right away.

  1. 01How many poorly rated businesses, depending on your question?
  2. 02Why other sources give different numbers
  3. 03Hygiene inspection terms in plain English
  4. 04Which types of business receive poor ratings?
  5. 05Independents, chains, franchises: who receives poor ratings?
  6. 06Which networks, and who makes purchasing decisions?
  7. 07How large are the accounts? Company revenue and profiles
  8. 08Why did the inspection take place?
  9. 09Where are poorly rated businesses located?
  10. 10The market changes every month
  11. 11How do you find and understand a business's hygiene rating?
  12. 12Poorly rated: what should the business do?
  13. 13How can you use these figures for market research?
  14. 14How do you build a prospect list of poorly rated businesses?
  15. 15Frequently asked questions
  16. 16Do you sell to food businesses?
  17. 17Method
  18. 18Key takeaways

Free, no conditions. To cite a figure, use the reference given under “Cite this study”, with Scalon and the date of the edition.

PDF · 51 pages · 1017 KB

Get the study as a PDF

The download link arrives by email within a minute.

A work address is enough. We use it to send the study and the next edition when it is published. One-click unsubscribe: see the privacy policy.

Cite this study#

Scalon Observatory, "Number of food businesses with poor hygiene ratings in France: 14,700 in one year," November 9, 2026: about 14,700 food businesses received at least one poor hygiene inspection rating between September 26, 2025 and September 24, 2026, or about 1 inspected business in 5; about 85% are independents outside chains; 4,450 were still listed with poor ratings on Alim'Confiance (direction générale de l'alimentation) on November 9, 2026. https://scalon.fr/en/observatory/food-businesses-haccp-compliance

Sources#

The official texts, studies and data used.

See the sources

The list of food businesses to bring into hygiene compliance, for your area and your target: we send it within two business days.

Get the full list